The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications,
caveats, and cautions
Sheil, D. & Wunder, S . (2003)
In: Conservation
Ecology (online journal) 6(2):22p. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art9.
The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence
how policy makers and others perceive forestlands. A small number of
valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts
supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used
to justify inappropriate actions. The end users of such results are rarely
those who produced them, and misunderstanding of key details is a concern.
One defense is to ensure that the ultimate users better appreciate shortcomings
and common pitfalls. In this article, the authors aim to reduce such
risks by discussing how valuation studies should be assessed and challenged
by users. The authors consider two concise, high profile valuation papers
here, by Peters and colleagues and by Godoy and colleagues. They illustrate
a series of questions that should be asked, not only about the two papers,
but also about any landscape valuation study.
The article highlights the many challenges faced in valuing tropical
forestlands and in presenting and using results sensibly, and it offers
some suggestions for improvement. Attention to complexities and clarity
about uncertainties are required. Forest valuation must be pursued and
promoted with caution.
Download PDF : Sheil_and_Wunder.pdf
(307 Kb)
|